-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daryle Lockhart
Sent: Friday, 19 May, 2006 06:45
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Way OT: McCartney may lose quarter of fortune
in divorce
What I loved about this story was how they were going to use his
"genius" as a defense. How much of a genius is this dude? He gives
Michael Jackson the blueprint to making millions by buying the
Beatles catalog. For most of us, that would be enough of a wake up
call to get "better with money". Not ol' Paulie. This dude meets a
model in her 30s and doesn't sign a pre-nup. Way to go, genius.
I hereby request a moratorium on celebrity weddings. At this point I
don't even have hope for Storm and T'Challa.
Daryle.
On May 19, 2006, at 3:34 AM, Tracey de Morsella (formerly Tracey L.
Minor) wrote:
I agree! Amen
Keith Johnson wrote:
> Daaaamn! How the heck does only four years of marriage translate into
> getting upwards of three-hundred *MILLION* dollars in a divorce?
I'm all
> for being equitable, but McCartney made 99.9% of that before he
ever met
> this lady. (And for those of you who think I'm hatin' on the
ladies, i
> said the same thing about Terry McMillan's ex-husband trying to
get her
> dough). This almost makes me believe in prenupts--at least for
the rich
> and (in)famous.
>
> Paul, that's what you get for marrying a child the second time
around!
> Oh well, I guess he can limp along with the 1.2 billion she'll leave
> him! :)
>
>
> McCartney may lose quarter of fortune in divorce
> By Paul MajendieThu May 18, 8:21 AM ET
>
> Former Beatle Paul McCartney could lose up to a quarter of his
estimated
> $1.56-billion fortune after separating from his second wife Heather
> Mills, legal experts said on Thursday.
> That would equate to roughly $1.9 million for every week of their
> short-lived four-year marriage.
> McCartney, 63, and former model Mills, 38, announced their
separation on
> Wednesday, blaming media intrusion for the collapse of one of the
most
> high profile showbusiness marriages.
> Lawyers believe the divorce would never be allowed to degenerate
into a
> messy court case but they said McCartney's decision not to seal a
> pre-nuptial deal could cost him dear in a private settlement.
> The couple, who have a two-year-old daughter, Beatrice, met in
1999 at a
> charity event, a year after the death from breast cancer of
McCartney's
> first wife Linda Eastman.
> Lawyer Mark Stephens of Finers, Stephens and Innocent told Reuters:
> "Heather and the child need to be looked after financially. I
think you
> are looking at 150 million to 200 million pounds ($283-377 million)."
> "She is the child of a Beatle and they have to live in a cosseted and
> protected environment," he said, recalling the killing of John
Lennon by
> a crazed fan and the attempt on the life of George Harrison.
> Independent legal estimates on how much Heather could get are
based on a
> recent high profile divorce dispute between fund manager Alan
Miller and
> his wife Melissa.
> She was awarded five million pounds of his 20 million pound fortune
> after a childless marriage that lasted less than three years. The
House
> of Lords, Britain's highest court, is to make a final ruling on
the case
> next week.
> After their separation was announced, McCartney denied that
Heather had
> ever been attracted to his fortune, estimated by the Sunday Times
Rich
> List at 825 million pounds ($1.56 billion).
> "It's been suggested that she married me for the money," he said.
"There
> is not an ounce of truth in this."
> In an interview before her marriage, Mills said she had offered to
sign
> a pre-nuptial agreement but McCartney had turned down the offer.
> "The acid test is now," said Stephen Foster, head of the divorce
> department at Stewarts. "I think it would be a big award. I
wouldn't be
> shocked if it is 100 million pounds."
> "He famously didn't sign a pre-nup as he said it was unromantic.
If they
> don't resolve things amicably and it becomes a protracted court case,
> that could be a very expensive decision," he said.
> "If Paul and Heather had any sense -- and I am sure they do --- they
> would both seek top quality independent advice from lawyers and
> accountants and settle this round a table. Is it in anyone's
interest to
> be front page news for a year?"
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Science fiction and fantasy Genre magazine
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "scifinoir2" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
SPONSORED LINKS
Science
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Science+fiction+and+fantasy&w1=Scie
nce+fiction+and+fantasy&w2=Genre+magazine&c=2&s=53&.sig=8s5ldQicr16mMwkM
wHGybg> fiction and fantasy Genre
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Genre+magazine&w1=Science+fiction+a
nd+fantasy&w2=Genre+magazine&c=2&s=53&.sig=6x48yHym4cI_VD4C3GisSg>
magazine
_____
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "scifinoir2
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
_____
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
SPONSORED LINKS
| Science fiction and fantasy | Genre magazine |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "scifinoir2" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
