I agree totally that he is opening the door for others, hopefully, it 
won't be for one type of film.  My "bias" is based on what I have seen 
in the past.  so, I will keep an open mind. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> i'm not as concerned about Perry's films as many of y'all are. I do 
> understand the fear that a certain type of film will become the 
> standard: that Hollywood white and black will say "This is the 
> formula" and produce countless clones. Valid fear, 'cause God knows I 
> still cringe at what happened after the critical and box office 
> success of "Boyz in the hood" and "Menace 2 Society". All of a suddent 
> hood movies become as plentiful as mushrooms. I was afraid that Medea 
> was going to be all over the place...
>
> But, look at "Why Did I Get Married?" compared to the Medea movies. It 
> moves away from the slapstick of the cross-dressing Perry, and from 
> what I hear, minimizes some of the more obvious slapstick elements of 
> Medea. In other words, it moved a ways toward being a more serious 
> study of Black relationships. And yet it still made major bank, based 
> on Perry's name. Next year he could do a great romantic comedy like 
> "Love Jones", or he could do a straight up drama with a black man and 
> woman0--and people would come. Perry alone could help bring serious 
> black movies to the big screen, and maybe doing it in steps like this 
> will help black audiences learn to expect more than Medea.
>
> And as Perry brings us along and the money keeps rolling in, I can see 
> other black directors trying their hand at it too. Sure, some--most, 
> in fact--will fall by the wayside. Many won't make much dough. But I 
> really see what he's doing as functioning as another door opener like 
> Spike Lee. When it comes to "serious" black films, the doors only open 
> a crack, unfortunately, but it's still open. I'm excited about what 
> Perry will do, which I choose to see as making the way more more and 
> different films, not closing it.
>
> but I could be wrong...
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: "Tracey de Morsella (formerly Tracey L. Minor)" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:tdlists%40multiculturaladvantage.com>>
>
> > I do not remember Spike lee's movies beating out the blockbusters by
> > almost doubling their take. This a major milestone in Black film. He
> > has surpassed Lee. --Not to negate the fact that Lee paved the way for
> > him and others. With Blacks representing 90% of the audience, it
> > seems that he is delivering what Black moviegoers, in general, want 
> to see.
> >
> > Regarding Tim Story and The Fantastic Four, we are talking apples and
> > oranges. Daryl, I don't claim to know you, by I do know your posting
> > personality. The Daryl I know, knows the difference between the
> > weaknesses of Fantastic Four and the fear of how the success of Perry's
> > movies will impact Black film in a way similar to what is going on with
> > Black books. By the Spike Spike lee's impact on the movie industry has
> > been huge. He started the trend of doing movies on shoe string budget
> > and then getting them distributed. I've seen at least four shoestring
> > movies this year that have won prestigious awards. I think Lee and
> > Redford are a major reason that is possible.
> >
> > My fear stems from the fact he is serving a huge demand. Demand often
> > drives the industry. Spike Lee's movies, while popular, never had that
> > type of demand. Perry is just giving the public where they want.
> > That's simply good business... whether I like it or not
> >
> > Daryle wrote:
> > >
> > > Tyler Perry is the new Spike Lee. Nothing more, nothing less. 
> Spike did
> > > movies to get people talking and bring the community out. It worked.
> > >
> > > If we're gonna be worried about a Black director's success making 
> it hard
> > > for more "serious" Black filmmakers.. .what about Tim Story?
> > >
> > > On 10/16/07 8:07 PM, "Tracey de Morsella (formerly Tracey L. Minor)"
> > > > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > 90% of the audiences were Black. I think his name carries weight 
> in a
> > > > lot of circles of the African American community. Unfortunately, 
> I fear
> > > > you are right in your prediction of a large volume of 
> embarrassing Black
> > > > films that are similar to some of the books you refer to. I hope 
> that
> > > > without Perry's name on the marquee, success won't be guaranteed.
> > > > Unfortunately, I fear that is a long-run.
> > > >
> > > > ravenadal wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Tyler Perry's "Why Did I Get Married?" is number one at the box
> > > >> office, taking in $21.4, almost twice as much as this weekend's 
> No. 2
> > > >> film, "The Game Plan."
> > > >>
> > > >> While I wish Mr. Perry all the best, his success (this is his 
> third
> > > >> number one at the box office) does not bode well for serious black
> > > >> filmmakers, or black filmmakers in general. His success will 
> lead to
> > > >> something similar to the embarrassing black publishing boom in 
> large
> > > >> part spawned by the success of Terry McMillan.
> > > >>
> > > >> I am personally curious as to why "Why Did I Get Married?" 
> struck gold
> > > >> with black (and white) movie-goers while Chris Rock's "I Think 
> I Love
> > > >> My Wife," tanked. "Married" unseen, I am confident "Wife" is a
> > > >> better, more accomplished movie.
> > > >>
> > > >> ~rave!
> > > >>
> > > >>> Actually, I think its the same syndrome as the Black Movie
> > > >>> industry. Movies like Soul Plane get multi-million dollar
> > > >>> promotion while movies like Why Did I Get Married don't. To
> > > >>> paraphrase Marshall McCluan(sp?) - the media don't tell us 
> that to
> > > >>> think, but they *do* tell us what to think about.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to