wow, how can it be the "History" channel, and be so off in its depiction of historic figures??
-------------- Original message -------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 3/10/08 12:12:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I guess there's no accounting for taste. I'd be interested to see what the > second week's box office take will be. I still have "There Will Be Blood", > "Persepolis", and "The Bank Job" on my radar. > Agreed. I'm starting to go more by the second, not first weeks takes to see if a movie is actually good enough to see. Due to the WOM (World of Mouth) effect of those who seen it first affect. > > Speaking of, the History Channel did a special today about what the world > was like in 10,000 B.C., specifically, about North America and the first > peoples that populated this part of the world, walking across (I guess) the > Bering > Strait land bridge. The actors they chose to represent these ancient people > were all as white and European as the dude starring in "10,000 B.C.". Though > I > love programs like this, i turned the channel in disgust. > I'm not surprised. After all this is his channel that showed both Hannable and Khan as white dudes. > > -GTW ************** It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
