Keith, I get the feeling that CN made the mistake of looking at the "success" 
that Siffy's had with the ratings on their reality programming and opted to 
follow suit, without bothering to look at the complaints. Also, there might be 
the money factor at play. In this depressed economy, they may be looking for 
cheap programming.

"If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director?" -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 03:46:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Is SyFy Trying to Chase Away Viewers?















 




    
                  
And now even Cartoon Network is doing "reality" shows! WTF?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tracey de Morsella" <tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com>
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 1:02:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Is SyFy Trying to Chase Away Viewers?







 




    
                  I thing they are preserving the audience they want.  The 
people who like

those silly reality shows and the most hideous night on television.  They

are making more of those, not less.  Too bad they are not trying to expand

their audience to include those they used to have



-----Original Message-----

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On

Behalf Of angelababycat

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:59 AM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Is SyFy Trying to Chase Away Viewers?



Get out of my head, Keith!  I was thinking of posting a very similar

comentary re SyFy Channel's poor performance this summer.  The BCA and even

relatively obscure stations like Sluth, G4 and Chiller had more interesting

programming lately.  



And what if some shows like ST Voyager cost more? Isn't it better in the

long run if it preserves viewership?  One of my clients just went through

the rebranding process this summer, so I saw how expensive and time

comsuming it is.  Maybe all that effort should have been spent on

programming instead.



They will really need to come back strong this fall, as well as realize that

people watch TV all year round.



Angela



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@...> wrote:

>

> So we had a long holiday weekend, and, going into it, I prepared myself

for another weekend of marathons. You know: Twilight Zone all day Saturday,

"Enterprise" or TNG on Monday. Maybe some "Eureka" or BSG thrown in for good

measure. But know what we got instead? All day Sunday, the "reality" show

"Destination Truth", and all day Labor Day, "Ghost Hunters". WTF??? 

> 

> Look, SyFy has a huge backlog of scifi series, successful and canceled,

that they can show. There's "The Dresden Files", "Special Unit 7". there's

even that creepy show with Matthew Fox that took place in a weird hospital.

What about old eps of "First Wave"? I'd take that over searches for urban

legends and local myths. Hell, they can pull out Space: Above and Beyond if

they want. I'd watch it over those idiot Ghostbuster wannabes. 

> 

> Fortunately I wasn't home very much, so didn't have to depend on the telly

for entertainment. But when I was home? I watched marathons of "Ben 10:

Alien Force", "Wolverine and the X-Men", and science fact shows "The

Universe" and "Planet Earth" instead. Sad that I'm more excited to watch

cartoons more than a supposed science fiction channel all weekend.

>



------------------------------------



Post your SciFiNoir Profile at

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYa

hoo! Groups Links





 

      

    
    
        
        




        
        

 

      

    
    
        
        
        
        


        


        
        
_________________________________________________________________
HotmailĀ® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009

Reply via email to