This flick is closing in on $400,000,000 worldwide and "only" cost $90,000,000. They are talking movie series and not tv. I wonder who they will cast as Prof. Moriarty.
I would like to see a pay cable version of Ritchie's Rock N' Rolla. I know we'll never get a theatrical sequel so I would love to see a miniseries or something to continue the story. --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. Worf" <hellomahog...@...> wrote: > > That was my first thoughts too. Now I'm glad that I saw it. > > I just hope that they don't try to take two different actors and turn it > into a tv show. > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:04 AM, B Smith <daikaij...@...> wrote: > > > The reviews were pretty good. It was more griping from "true" fans over > > Ritchie's take. Turns out it was the fans of the movie Sherlock Holmes > > series and not the Holmes of the books. They thought his style and > > storytelling didn't mesh with Sherlock Holmes. Boy were they wrong. Ritchie > > did his homework by going to the source material and delivered an > > entertaining and exciting film. > > > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Tracey de Morsella" <tdlists@> > > wrote: > > > > > > I read all good reviews. I'm dying to see it. What did you hear? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On > > > Behalf Of B Smith > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 8:56 AM > > > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Sherlock Holmes > > > > > > I don't know why this movie got so much flack at first. It's was very > > good > > > and Downey and Law were excellent. > > > > > > Guy Ritchie has his golden ticket to A list status now. > > > > > > --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. Worf" <HelloMahogany@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Just saw the movie, and I enjoyed it. Lots of authentic looking eye > > candy. > > > > Interesting plot. Robert Downey's Sherlock seemed right on target. I > > was > > > > leery that they would somehow over do it but it felt right. > > > > > > > > Dr. Watson got a bit of an upgrade which made his character more > > enjoyable > > > > than previous incarnations. Jude Law made a believable counterpart to > > > > Sherlock. > > > > > > > > Bonus points for the Steampunk gadgetry. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity! > > > > Mahogany at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > Post your SciFiNoir Profile at > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYa > > > hoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Post your SciFiNoir Profile at > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo! > > Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity! > Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ >
