Stoic wont play to modern audiences in the way they wanted. Unless your
making a Merchat Ivory film....complicated is the way to go. The protag
needs to be vulnerable and unstoppable.....Downy is perfect.

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Keith Johnson
<keithbjohn...@comcast.net>wrote:

>
>
> But back to my point, is Holmes in the books as emotionally complicated as
> Downey's portrayal? The movies I've seen all have Holmes are more stoic than
> Downey. Not a Vulcan or anything, but more controlled. So, do you think Law
> in the role would have dictated a less demonstrative Holmes?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Omari Confer" <clockwork...@gmail.com>
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 3:03:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What if Actors' Roles were Switched in "Sherlock
>  Holmes"?
>
>
>
> Law doesnt have the emotional depth to pull off Sherlock. Plain and simple.
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@comcast.net
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> After seeing the movie last Sunday, I was wondering about the casting.
>> Downey and Law are really good, but why did Ritchie cast them that way? Law,
>> who's taller, a bit leaner, and has a bit more of an intensely thoughtful
>> look, would seem at first glance to be the natural choice to play Holmes. At
>> least, he probably on the surface appears closer to the tall, lean, serious
>> Holmes of all those movies i saw as a kid. Downey, with his shorter stature,
>> lined, worn face, large expressive eyes, and tendency to look comical,
>> serious,and slightly "off" all at once, would seem to be a good fit for a
>> slightly comedic Watson--the guy who comments/critiques/jokes from the
>> sidelines as the oh-so-serious Holmes goes about solving the crimes.
>>
>> Indeed,  i can see a time before Downey's return to such lofty heights,
>> where another director would probably think it natural to cast the dapper
>> and handsome Law as Holmes, and the quixotic Downey as his funny sidekick.
>> Wonder how such a movie would have turned out? Would the casting have
>> dictated a more traditional take on the characters? Would Rithie's slight
>> twist on the traditional movie treatments of the characters still have
>> worked if the roles had been switched?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> READ MY BLOG
> http://centralheatingblog.blogspot.com
> STRING THEORY
> http://stringtheory.podbean.com
>
>   
>



-- 
READ MY BLOG
http://centralheatingblog.blogspot.com
STRING THEORY
http://stringtheory.podbean.com

Reply via email to