I am considering that, but I want to finish it first, because I've read a
couple of other stories posted online that were truly spectacular, but ended
up unfinished because the writers lost steam or focus. Don't want to leave
readers hanging.

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:53 PM, brent wodehouse <brent_wodeho...@thefence.us
> wrote:

>
>
> Martin Baxter <martinbaxt...@gmail.com <martinbaxter7%40gmail.com>>
> writes:
>
> >Basically, a modern-day nobleman revisiting his pirate days in order to
> >help a friend and save his own life (through the injudicious use of time
> >travel). This comes in because I have a character whose species evolved
> >from a primitive offshoot of mankind
> .
>
> Do you have plans to post it once you've completed it? It sounds an
> interesting read. Good luck with it. :-)
>
> Brent
>
> >On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:38 PM, brent wodehouse <[
> >mailto:brent_wodeho...@thefence.us <brent_wodehouse%40thefence.us> ]
> brent_wodeho...@thefence.us <brent_wodehouse%40thefence.us>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Martin Baxter <[ 
> >>mailto:martinbaxter7%40gmail.com<martinbaxter7%2540gmail.com>
>
> >]martinbaxt...@gmail.com <martinbaxter7%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>The screaming you hear is from every fire-and-brimstone preacher south of
> >>the Mason-Dixon, lest anyone wonder...
> >>
> >>Seriously, this is amazing stuff. Fuel for part of the story I'm working
> >>on. Thanks again, Brent!
> >
> >
> >Story? Of what variety? Inquiring minds...
> >
> >
> >Brent
> >
> >>On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:49 PM, brent wodehouse
> >><[ mailto:brent_wodehouse%40thefence.us<brent_wodehouse%2540thefence.us>]
> brent_wodeho...@thefence.us <brent_wodehouse%40thefence.us>>
>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>[
> >
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html
> >]
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html
>
> >>
> >>Missing link between man and apes found.
> >>
> >>A "missing link" between humans and their apelike ancestors has been
> >>discovered
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to