3D in Shrek4 was pretty good. I actually blinked a couple of time when things flew at the screen.
Gerald Haynes http://thesmallfries.com - Calvin & Hobbes who? http://dontarrestus.com - Latino based sci-fi comic strip fun ________________________________ From: Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@comcast.net> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sat, July 3, 2010 5:40:30 PM Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] "Last Airbender" Widely Panned Best 3D I've seen next to "Avatar" was in "How to Train Your Dragon". I also saw that movie in 2D, and I have to admit it was great there. The 3D was a bit blurry in fast-moving scenes, but otherwise it was fantastic. But, seeing as I loved the film in both forms, I can say again that the 3D worked in this case as I believe 3D should: to enhance a film and make the experience better, but *not* be the main focus, intrusive, or essential to the enjoyment of the movie in its absence. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Street" <streetforce1@ gmail.com> To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2010 3:22:47 PM Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] "Last Airbender" Widely Panned The movie wasn't that bad. It makes me never want to see another 3D movie with no 3D in it ever again however. I think Hollywood is really searching for the next big franchise to take the place of Harry Potter and they can't find it.
