LeBron is not the second coming of Curt Flood but a distastful as it appeared 
he 
moved branding and marketing to a new level. As mentioned ealrier , look how 
the 
hot dog eating contest, Triple Crown horse races are packeged into an hour, or 
more long segment (s)?
 At the end of the day we cannot compare eras. Though most of sports talk radio 
use rose colored glasses on the Magic/Bird era and the same with Jordan these 
athletes are bigger, stronger, faster and better.


 



________________________________
From: Daryle Lockhart <dar...@darylelockhart.com>
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, July 11, 2010 4:42:57 PM
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: LeBron James "The Decision" top-ranked show on 
Thursday night

  
There's a HUGE difference between Paris Hilton showing up  at a movie premiere 
and making the event about her,  or her losing a Sidekick and having the 
addresses be made public -- and LeBron donating  2.5 million dollars in ad 
revenue to the Boys & Girls Clubs of Cleveland. HUGE. 


LeBron's free agency is historic - for SPORTS.  Sports on TV is not new. They 
interview coaches and players after games all the time. It takes sometimes 30 
 minutes.  Or, if it's Brett Farve's last game,  it can take 48 minutes on NFL 
Network. It's part of the process. Nobody MAKES anybody watch sports coverage 
on 
ESPN. ESPN is barely  even in anybody's basic cable package.

This is a situation where  the team's majority owner thought he had LeBron 
where 
he wanted him. He put a stack of money on the table. LeBron chose happiness 
instead. Dan GIlbert turned this into a bigger debacle with his letter...that 
he 
STILL hasn't taken down.

I want to address something  said earlier.  LeBron was a small  forward playing 
for the Cleveland Cavaliers. He is now a member of the new Celtics. He's 
playing 
 for a Pat Riley team.  For every fan he "lost", he gained 2. Starting with me. 
I'm a lifelong Lakers fan,  but I respect LeBron's decision more than anything 
else I've seen. He and Maverick Carter,  his business partner,  singlehandedly 
 brought excitement  back into the NBA for THOUSANDS of people. Addiionally, 
 for every "fan"  LeBron lost,  Cleveland lost 2 thanks to Dan's letter.  Think 
about  what that  letter  means to  someone who is a freshman star  player at 
some college somewhere.  Now you don't wanna go to Cleveland because the owner 
is a jerk.

Let's not get  to  far  adrift of the truth  here.  The Cavs weren't some high 
winning  legacy team that rescued some kid from the streets and taught  him to 
 read. They were the worst team in the NBA in 2003 and THAT's how they were 
able 
to get LeBron out of high school.  there was no recruiting  experience for 
LeBron then. They  man put 7 years into a worthless team,  sold more tickets 
and 
jerseys for them than they'd seen since the 60s, and now has the audacity to 
 want to go play  for a winning  team. the owner's letter  challenged LeBron's 
desire to  LEAVE TOWN. WTF?  Has anyone here  been to Ohio in the winter? Then 
tried winter in Miami?  Hell, Drew CAREY left Cleveland!

Furthermore,  young people now have an example of what they can do to take 
control of their career. You don't have to be a Terrell Owens and find out on 
Sports Center  that you're cut  from the team. YOU can hold the press 
conference,  make a difference in the world,  and go where YOU  wanna go.

LeBron James didn't waste anybody's hour of time,  it was on ESPN. It was as 
big 
a waste of time as any  other  sports event  ever  televised.  If you  have no 
interest in it, it  doesn't make sense to watch. I  think his event  was,  for 
Africans in America for whom sports is a part of life, the single most 
 important thing to see since the inauguration. Yes. To se a young  Black man 
taking  control  of his life and not defending some criminal  accusation is 
important.  I can't think of anything MORE important,  but hey...I love sports. 
So  I watch.


 

On Jul 10, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Keith Johnson wrote:

  
>
>
>Sorry, I have to disagree in relation to this particular case. I think this is 
>less about white outrage at him being black, and simply people who need to get 
>lives upset because a sports hero "deserted" him. If it were just about a 
>uppity 
>negro, blacks like me--who thinks he overhyped this, as did the media--wouldn' 
>t 
>be irritated. Nor would all the blacks in Cleveland who idolized him (don't 
>know 
>how many there are) be as upset. The racial/racist angle is there as always: 
>when blacks disappoint whites, you can be sure there are healthy doses of 
>"nig--r" thrown around. But I can't blame all this on whites being pissed 
>because a black man asserted himself. I see this in the same vein as the Paris 
>Hilons, reality show "stars", and increasing number of celebrities hot and 
>cold 
>who do anything they can to keep their names and faces in the media. Note that 
>the least part of this whole thing being discussed in any circles other than 
>sports nuts is the actual impact on the game of basketball. Rather, more 
>discussion is on his Larry King interview, this, why he wasted an hour on what 
>could have been a five-minute press statement, etc.
>
>Black or not, this is to me another step up the ladder of media-focus and 
>celebrity that makes people care more about famous people's lives sometimes 
>than 
>their own...
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kelwyn" <ravena...@yahoo. com>
>To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
>Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 11:55:58 AM
>Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: LeBron James "The Decision" top-ranked show on 
>Thursday night
>
>  
>And I still think the scariest thing in America is a free black man.
>
>~rave!
>
>--- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Keith Johnson <KeithBJohnson@ ...> wrote:
>>
>> And like i said, i hate it when done by corporations or individuals. There 
>> is 
>>too much of this self-promoting, self-aggrandizing, "famous because you're 
>>famous" culture going on nowadays. This was bloated and unnecessary. You hear 
>>people talking about it who could care less about the NBA and realize they're 
>>only talking about it because *others* are talking about it. They're focused 
>>on 
>>James because he made himself a focus, along with ESPN's help. Even in terms 
>>of 
>>basketball, this isn't really that big of a deal. By that, I mean that the 
>>Heat 
>>possibly winning a championship isn't as huge as, say, even if Michael Jordan 
>>had moved back in the day. Truth, this should have been of interest to 
>>Cleveland, Miami, true NBA fans, and that's it. It doesn't truly redefine the 
>>game or anything. And despite our talk of its economic impact on Cleveland, 
>>that's not really the focus of the news stories. It really is "hey! Everyone 
>>said this is a big deal, so let's cover it". 
>>
>> I find that troubling, and just because big business already does it, it 
>>doesn't mean the individuals need to do it do. Maybe everyone needs to back 
>>off 
>>a bit on this stuff... 
>>
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Kelwyn" <ravena...@.. .> 
>> To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
>> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 7:20:04 AM 
>> Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: LeBron James "The Decision" top-ranked show on 
>>Thursday night 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> As I've stated previously, I find it both interesting and disheartening that 
>>people are okay when corporations (the NBA, the New York Athletic Club, the 
>>Kentucky Derby) put on one of these bloated hour-long programs with two 
>>minutes 
>>of content but are aghast when an individual does it. Like the police officer 
>>in 
>>"Malcolm X" most folks seem to think, "That is too much power for one black 
>>man 
>>to have!" 
>>
>> 
>> I am not displeased that Mr. James' asserted his "manhood right" to apply 
>> his 
>>trade where ever he wants to. 
>>
>> 
>> ~rave! 
>> 
>> --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com , Martin Baxter <martinbaxter7@> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > The across-the-board reaction I'm hearing in this is that, in the public 
>> > eye, LeBron had lost a lots of fans over this. And not because he left 
>> > Cleveland. I've heard that event described, most charitably, as an 
>> > "infomercial" . Doesn't bother me only because I watch so few NBA games (a 
>> > grand total of six this past season, counting the playoffs). 
>> > 
>> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kelwyn <ravenadal@> wrote: 
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/07/09/lebron-james-the-decision-is-top-rated-tv-show-on-thursday/56595
>> 
>> > > 
>> > > Thursday night's LeBron James "The Decision" on ESPN drew a 7.3 
>> > > household 

>> > > rating in the preliminary overnight ratings. 
>> > > Compare that to the top rated show on broadcast last night, a repeat of 
>> > > The 
>>
>> > > Mentalist on CBS, which drew a 6.0 household rating in the preliminary 
>> > > overnights. 
>> > > Update: Here is ESPN's official press release. 
>> > > A 7.3 is twice what an average NBA game ranks. 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > "If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell 
>> > wrote the script?" -- Charles E Grant 
>> > 
>> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik 
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>




      

Reply via email to