On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Mathieu Blondel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Alexandre Gramfort > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I feel there is 2 different things: on one side the package name in > > pypi, the url and the doc > > and the other side the import name. scikit-learn will continue to be > > called and advertised as > > scikit-learn. sklearn is just the import name. I don't pronounce it I > > just type it :) > > Good point. It would be nice if all scikits could use "sk" as a prefix > for the import name.
I thought the main goal when we started talking about dropping scikits was simply to avoid having namespace packages. It sounds like this is no longer the focus? Skipper ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
