2011/10/9 Robert Layton <[email protected]>: > A quick question I wasn't able to find in the website... are there any > reporting/administrative obligations required as part of joining? i.e. would > this project need to tick any extra boxes as part of an ongoing commitment? > Other than that (and I assume even if there are mild requirements) this > sounds like a great idea!
By quickly reading the website I did not see any particular constraints besides that the goal of the project should be developing code or documentation under OSI compatible license for the code and public domain or CC-By or CC-By-SA for the doc. They also encourage but not require to give the Software Freedom Conservancy a percentage of the donations the member project receives which I think is fare (we will have to decide on this if our project gets accepted). I encourage all of you to read this FAQ (it's a 5 minutes read). http://sfconservancy.org/members/apply/ Hence I think it's matching our pattern. -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
