Hi Peter. Thanks for checking! It seems I forgot to rebuild :-/. My bad. Cheers, Andy
On 11/23/2011 10:48 AM, Peter Prettenhofer wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I've checked the master branch and everything works fine. _tree.c is > updated; find_best_split returns a 4-tuple. Can you please update the > master branch, run `make`, and check again. > > best, > Peter > > 2011/11/23 Andreas Müller<[email protected]>: >> Hi everybody. >> (And sorry for spamming the list so much the last couple of days) >> I was just trying to run bench_sgd_covertype and ran into a problem >> in the tree module. I just did a pull on master so I should be on the >> current version. >> The problem is in tree.py line 292-294, recursive_partition(). >> find_split seems to return three values, while four values are expected. >> Is that something that is wrong in the benchmark or is that a problem in >> tree? >> >> Cheers, >> Andy >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure >> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, >> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this >> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Scikit-learn-general mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
