this would also be consistent with the evaluation done here:
http://wise.io/wiserf.html
cheers,
satra
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Prettenhofer <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a quick benchmark to compare sklearn's RandomForestClassifier
> against R's randomForest package.
>
> you can find the benchmark in this gist: https://gist.github.com/4089926
>
> In terms of training time, R's randomForest is usually about a factor
> of 2 faster (depends on the nr of features - for few features it grows
> to a factor of 4)
>
> What strikes me is that the speedup for n_jobs=4 is not as expected
> (I've an quad-core i7).
>
> best,
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Prettenhofer
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
