Sorry, I got confused with binarizer somehow. Thanks, Lars.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Lars Buitinck <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2013/7/9 Joel Nothman <[email protected]>:
> > * You probably want to use Encoder rather than LabelEncoder in that
> example
>
> There is no Encoder. But LabelEncoder is indeed the wrong thing to
> use, since it encodes *labels*, not *samples*, using a one-hot scheme.
> On feature arrays, the result is unspecified.
>
> But even if you'd skip the LabelEncoder, passing the result of
> make_classification to OneHotEncoder still makes no sense. The
> features are not categorical.
>
> --
> Lars Buitinck
> Scientific programmer, ILPS
> University of Amsterdam
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
