I'd go with AgglomerativeClusterer, Adding the hierarchical bit will make
it too long.
While agglomerative doesn't have to mean hierarchical, the usage is
consistent enough that I don't predict it causing much confusion.
On 23 July 2013 19:54, Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 10:52 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote:
> > +1 for AgglomerativeClustering with linkage param to specify the
> criteria.
> >
> +1 if enough code is shared (which I think it will be)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
--
Public key at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ Search for this email address and select
the key from "2011-08-19" (key id: 54BA8735)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
