On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
[email protected]> wrote:
> > Currently, there is a reliance on the order of the data.
>
> Standard K-fold cross-validation relies on the order of the data, and that
> might be a good thing, if it reflects the dependency structure of the
> observations.
>
Seeing as it does a [fold_no::n_folds] sample, I don't think you're going
to capture a dependency structure.
Robert Layton wrote:
> However, I believe that adding a "shuffle" paramater to stratified
> cross-validation and a correspondong randomn-state would be great.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
> AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
> analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
> Visit us today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and
AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights,
analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management.
Visit us today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
