Thank you for your response, Gaël.
I understand that HMMs do not perform classification in the same manner as
SVMs or Random Forest, but why is it not desirable to create a new section
to handle HMMs and possibly other graphical models? They seem like an
extremely useful and widespread part of machine learning, and I know from
personal experience that I'd prefer to have all my machine learning from
the same source if possible.
Jacob
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Gael Varoquaux <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:34:14PM -0300, Felipe Eltermann wrote:
> > Sorry if I missed the discussion, but why is it out of scope?
>
> It boils down to the fact that HMM require structure between the samples.
> The API of scikit-learn has no way of specifying or enforcing this.
>
> Gaël
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
