+1

Thank you for the effort to formalize this!

Best,
Vlad

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019, 02:47 Noel Dawe <[email protected] wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
> +1 from me as well :)
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 8:54 PM Jacob Schreiber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me as well. Thanks for putting in the time to write this all out.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Hanmin Qin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (personally I still think it's better to keep the flow chart, it
>>> seems useful for beginners)
>>>
>>> Hanmin Qin
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Alexandre Gramfort <[email protected]>
>>> To: Scikit-learn mailing list <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document
>>> Date: 2019-02-11 01:29
>>>
>>> +1 for me too
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:06 PM Gilles Louppe <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andy,
>>>
>>> I read through to document. Even though I have not been really active
>>> these past months/years, I think it summarizes well our governance
>>> model.
>>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 12:01, Adrin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the work you've put in it!
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 03:00 Andreas Mueller <[email protected] wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hey all.
>>> >>
>>> >> I want to call a vote on the final version on the scikit-learn
>>> >> governance document, which can be found in this PR:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/12878
>>> >>
>>> >> It underwent some significant changes in the last couple of weeks.
>>> >>
>>> >> The two-sentence summary is: conflicts are resolved by vote among core
>>> >> devs, with a technical committee resolving anything that can not be
>>> >> decided by at least a 2/3 majority. The initial technical committee is
>>> >> Alexander Gramfort, Olivier Grisel, Joel Nothman, Hanmin Qin, Gaël
>>> >> Varoquaux and myself (Andreas Müller).
>>> >>
>>> >> I would ask all of the *core developers* to either vote +1 for the
>>> >> governance doc, -1 against it, or to explicitly abstain here on the
>>> >> public mailing list (which is the way any vote will be conducted
>>> >> according to the new governance document).
>>> >>
>>> >> I suggest we leave the vote open for two weeks, so that the decision
>>> is
>>> >> made before the sprint and we can take actions.
>>> >>
>>> >> Anyone can still comment on the PR or here, though I would rather not
>>> >> make more changes as this has already been discussed to some length.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you for participating,
>>> >>
>>> >> Andy
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > scikit-learn mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Reply via email to