As a user, I feel that (2) "sklearn.plot.XXX.plot_YYY" best allows for future expansion of sub-namespaces in a tractable way that is also easy to understand during code review. For example, sklearn.plot.tree.plot_forest() or sklearn.plot.lasso.plot_* .
Just my opinion. J.B. 2019年4月2日(火) 23:40 Hanmin Qin <qinhanmin2...@sina.com>: > See https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/13448 > > We've introduced several plotting functions (e.g., plot_tree and > plot_partial_dependence) and will introduce more (e.g., > plot_decision_boundary) in the future. Consequently, we need to decide > where to put these functions. Currently, there're 3 proposals: > > (1) sklearn.plot.plot_YYY (e.g., sklearn.plot.plot_tree) > > (2) sklearn.plot.XXX.plot_YYY (e.g., sklearn.plot.tree.plot_tree) > > (3) sklearn.XXX.plot.plot_YYY (e.g., sklearn.tree.plot.plot_tree, note > that we won't support from sklearn.XXX import plot_YYY) > > Joel Nothman, Gael Varoquaux and I decided to post it on the mailing list > to invite opinions. > > Thanks > > Hanmin Qin > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
