I'm strongly supportive of moving to keyword only arguments. Andrew
<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> J. Andrew Howe, PhD LinkedIn Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ahowe42> ResearchGate Profile <http://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Howe12/> Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-1990> Github Profile <http://github.com/ahowe42> Personal Website <http://www.andrewhowe.com> I live to learn, so I can learn to live. - me <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:21 AM Joel Nothman <joel.noth...@gmail.com> wrote: > As per our Governance <http://scikit-learn.org/stable/governance.html> > document, changes to API principles are to be established through an > Enhancement Proposal (SLEP) from which any core developer can call for a > vote on its acceptance. > > *SLEP009 Keyword Only Arguments is the first SLEP up for a vote. Please > see* > > *https://scikit-learn-enhancement-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/slep009/proposal.html > <https://scikit-learn-enhancement-proposals.readthedocs.io/en/latest/slep009/proposal.html>* > > *This proposal discusses the path to gradually forcing users to pass > arguments, or most of them, as keyword arguments only.* > > Core developers are invited to vote on this change until 11 October 2019 > by replying to this email thread. > > All members of the community are welcome to comment on the proposal on > this mailing list, or to propose minor changes through Issues and Pull > Requests at https://github.com/scikit-learn/enhancement_proposals/. > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
