Robert Roessler: > > I'm still undecided about this so don't want to ask you to do more > > work yet, but ... > > Perhaps I misconstrued your previous reply to me? > > "If you really want to do this and there is no large increase in code > then it can go in due to symmetry."
At that stage there was "just one call, an SCI_GETPROPERTY" which mirrored SCI_SETPROPERTY. > Since they are using Scintilla's existing "properties" facility, they > look exactly like... Scintilla property macros - perhaps we are just > having a naming-based confusion here (given that you do not use the > word "macro" for this replacement operation)? You are right. I didn't think this was defined in the documentation: I wonder who wrote that bit? > ScintillaDoc.html... as I have for most (all?) of the features/changes > implemented or requested by me to date - although the site is not > being updated to reflect said changes. :) Updating the site can cause trouble when there are features that aren't yet in a release. > I have added an updated Scintilla.iface to the getprops.zip on my > site. I am a little unsure about the get/fun usage here - I used get, > but maybe these should use fun? "fun" has been used for string results rather than "get" as the string is being returned in an argument rather than as the value and this should be continued. Neil _______________________________________________ Scintilla-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
