Robert Roessler:
> Other than that, any comments? Given how simple the code looks, is it
> something you could see going into Scintilla? If not now, then
> shortly after 1.68 goes out? Or do you feel that the GTK performance
> issues will be addressed some day, and you do not want "band-aid" code
> in Scintilla?
I don't like the extra complexity and may want it moved down into
the platform layer so is not seen for platforms that don't need it.
Maybe even #ifdefed out by default. The increase in memory or graphics
resource usage may not be viable for all. Unfortunately, I don't have
a lot of time currently for thinking about Scintilla.
> Will a 32/64-bit mask for (probably disabling) styles from being
> cached be adequate? "7" (or 8) presumably would work now...
Depends what you are doing. 128 would be OK for now but other
people had plans to make the style buffer be more than one byte wide.
Neil
_______________________________________________
Scintilla-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
