On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 11:56 +1000, Neil Hodgson wrote: > Iago Rubio: > > > I pointed out that SciTE and scintilla are licensed under the Python > > license, but there are other opinions such as the MIT license and the > > "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer" as it seems is stated on > > the Wikipedia. > > When creating SciTE, I copied the Python license. The term > "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer" was invented after this. > If you want to refer to the license as the "Historical Permission > Notice and Disclaimer" or "Python license" or "Old Python license" > because it fits into some distribution packaging then go ahead.
Thank you for the clarification. > The > license is the license text, not the term used to refer to it. Yes, of course. The license tag is just for the output of the rpm tool, when querying the package. The license text file will remain untouched. -- Iago Rubio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Scintilla-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
