Josiah Carlson wrote:
"Neil Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Projects based on Scintilla have been using indicators to mark
areas of text that contain errors, search matches, URL hotspots,
misspellings, etc. These areas are discovered through some user
initiated command or by running a background process rather than as
part of lexing. Such marks are often fairly sparse: a HTML syntax
checker may show 5 errors in a whole file. Its a little complex using
indicators in this way as the lexing state has to be preserved while
setting the indicator and there is only 1 to 3 bits available for this
state.
[snip]
Sounds great to me. Allowing so many indicators would allow for syntax
highlighting while also supporting SubEthaEdit-like pair/group
programming (something I've been looking to add to my scintilla-based
editor for quite a while), along with different colors for console
stdout/stderr/expected input in shells (also something I've been looking
to add for a while).
That would be great, we have some hacky patches to get coloring for
stdout/err/in that do not always work well.
Shane
_______________________________________________
Scintilla-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
