Hello,

In page 5 of Ross Anderson paper "Security in Open versus Closed Systems
� The Dance of Boltzmann, Coase and Moore" [1] from the Ross Anderson's
web page [2] you can read:

  " As testing is boring, and volunteers generally only want to fix
  failures that irritate them, the amount of concentrated attention paid
  by random community members to (say) the smartcard device drivers for
  GNU/Linux is unlikely to match what an enemy government might invest
  [10]. "

If I understand correctly Ross is saying that nobody is searching for
security bugs in pcsc-lite (which is true for my own case) but
government may be working on them (security bugs) and not say anything
about what they could found (to use the bugs later).

Read the paper. It is interesting and frightening for the free software
community.

I don't know what Marc? Schaefer said during tha Panel at Oakland 2001.
And I was not in Toulouse during Ross talk.

Anybody knows more about this remark by Ross Anderson or M Schaefer?

Bye,

[1] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/toulouse.pdf
[2] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rja14/

[10] M Schaefer, Panel comments at Oakland 2001

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le Camembert, L.R. --
***************************************************************
Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/
To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe sclinux
***************************************************************

Reply via email to