Ok, it's offtopic here, but I don't think, it is a good idea
to use such policy. Why to protect such thing ??

A good policy is to setup a box and to have a model earning
money on services not on the boxes or the system (linux).

The user can do what ever he/she wants to do, if the user
disconfigured the system, it his personal problem. Or it is
a good idea to do a protection (check) over the configuration.

But the user has to pay for services, C offers ...

With friendly regards
        Christoph P.



Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> My company is working for another company (let call it C) that is going to
> provide Linux boxes to its customers. As C is going to give them free or for a
> small fee, C doesn't want the customers to use the boxes for another purpose
> that the one specified by C.
> 
> C doesn't want the user to be able to:
>   - run another kernel than the one S provides
>   - run executables that have not been signed by authorized developpers or that
> have been modified (signed executables)
>   - change or alter the dynamic libraries (signed .so files)
>   - have access to the binary of some executables (for avoiding reverse
> engineering)
>   - save a file and give the disk to a friend (encrypted files, but I need to
> be fast on read and write, here)
> 
> All that by using:
>   - a SmartCard
>   - a modified kernel
>   - a specialised hardware for encryption
>   - maybe a modified loader (lilo)
> 
> And that mustn't be just simple tricks, we must protect those boxes against
> very skilled hackers.
> 
> Is there existing projects on those subjects? Is anybody already worked on it?
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> 
> ---
>   -°)                 Patrick Valsecchi
>   /\\
>  _\_v
> ***************************************************************
> Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
> (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
> http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
> ***************************************************************

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------
private:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
company:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***************************************************************
Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
***************************************************************

Reply via email to