Hi Sascha, You are right, this feature does not always work as expected. I participated in testing it, but perhaps I missed something.
The relevant bugs are: http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=265 http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1043 The person that understand this best is Doug, who implemented this feature. bug 265 contains considerable discussion on leveraging the CVS hooks to implement this. I would love to see this fixed. On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:03 +0100, Sascha Vogt wrote: > Hi all, > > As I'm currently searching for an option to link our internal CVS with > our Bugzilla, I came accross scmbug. > > The installation went well (in general) and I'm now struggling with the > "consolidate_cvs_messages" option. Once I enable it, no more comments > are added to Bugzilla. > > I'm currently on Bugzilla 3.4.10 and CVS 1.12.13 and Scmbug 0-26-21 > > I enabled DEBUG-logs and get the message: > "Scmbug INFO> CVS.pm:295:Scmbug::Glue::CVS::prepare_activity_commit - > The reference count is -1. Will exit." > > and I see various files under > /tmp/.scmbug_consolidated_cvs_activities_... which stay there. > > So I'm trying to find some info about the general architecture of the > consolidate feature to dive deeper into the issue. I also saw there is > an open bug (http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1043) so it might > be known. What I didn't get from that bug is how this files from tmp > should be processed, and by whom. > > Maybe someone on the list can shed some light on this. Any help would be > great. > > Greetings > -Sascha- > _______________________________________________ > scmbug-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
