I'm just not sure whether it wouldn't be better to have that "use
List::MoreUtils" dynamically evaluated since:
 - it's specific for Bugzilla 4.0 and higher
 - it could reside in $BUGZILLA_ROOT/lib only

Regards,
Yavor

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 17:13, Yavor Nikolov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Kristis,
>
> I have no idea if that could be rewritten in more elegant way. All the
> examples which I've searched through Internet and within Bugzilla code are
> using $_. The whole { $_ eq '' } expression is kind of lambda function with
> single argument.
>
> Regards,
> Yavor
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 16:56, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 09:05 +0200, Yavor Nikolov wrote:
>> > Hi Kristis,
>> >
>> > Bugzilla 4.0 has dropped lsearch as per the Release Notes
>> > (http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/4.0/release-notes.html):
>> >         The Bugzilla::Util::lsearch function is gone. Use firstidx
>> >         from List::MoreUtils, instead.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> >
>> >         -        my $pos = Bugzilla::Util::lsearch($resolution_values,
>> >         '');
>> >         +        my $pos = firstidx { $_ eq '' } @$resolution_values;
>>
>> Can this be written without using "$_" ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users

Reply via email to