Kristis,
Thanks for being pragmatic and helping out!
The customer's main concern was the volume of email traffic and that it would
get to be noise. But I totally agree that the volume is appropriate.
-Bill
On Apr 21, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Kristis Makris wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:36 -0700, William Deegan wrote:
>
>> They want to avoid the email traffic from reopening/closing the bugs
>> to add docs and testcases and such.
>
> The client does not understand that the email traffic is a good thing,
> not a bad thing. It tells them that what they considered solved, is in
> fact not solved.
>
>>> Scmbug helps enforce a change management process.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> I am glad you understand the process.
>
>> Alas.. they asked it it was possible.
>
> The following change will do it.
>
> Index: Bugzilla.pm.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file:
> /projects/scmbug/cvsroot/system/src/lib/product/Daemon/Bugzilla.pm.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.91
> diff -u -r1.91 Bugzilla.pm.in
> --- Bugzilla.pm.in 31 Mar 2011 01:39:31 -0000 1.91
> +++ Bugzilla.pm.in 22 Apr 2011 00:05:20 -0000
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> "RESOLVED" ],
> possible_resolutions => [ ] },
> "RESOLVED" => { name => "RESOLVED",
> - active => 0,
> + active => 1,
> accepts_data_as_resolution => 0,
> possible_resolution_states => [ "REOPENED" ],
> possible_resolutions => [ "FIXED",
>
_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
scmbug-users@lists.mkgnu.net
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
