On 29 July 2012, Gary Oberbrunner said: > We have a lot of little goodies now since 2.1.0. I have a few more > little things I'd perhaps like to get in, like Intel v12 compiler > support for Mac and Linux (I have a patch at work), but I think it's > time. I've done a few test builds using the new release procedure I > proposed a few weeks ago and things seem basically OK. (I didn't > solve the win64 exe problem, but since that's not a regression I think > we should just add some text on the website saying to use the zip > method on win64.) > > Anyone have additional things they'd like to get in? Anyone have any > issues that need to be addressed? Anyone think the new simplified > release procedure needs to be revised? (See my mail of July 15th.)
I'd love for someone to take a look at my pull request: https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-request/29/javacpathopt-add-tests-and-fix-bugs This adds unit tests to untested code and fixes a couple of simple, shallow bugs. It doesn't get much simpler, lower-risk than that. Took me about an hour to write starting from zero, and it should be a 10 min review. I hope. ;-) Greg -- Greg Ward http://www.gerg.ca/ Save energy: be apathetic. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
