Hi guys,
On 09.10.2012 19:39, William Deegan wrote:
Russel,
On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote:
I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown
I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
markup compared to ReStructured Text. On the other hand Markdown is very
Ruby, GitHub, whilst ReStructured Text is very Python.
Why the change? So that the read me file look reasonable on the
BitBucket page.
I can do the markup once a decision is made so there is no need for
anything other than a decision.
I vote for .rst (mainly because I'm already using it on a number of other
projects and it's python'y)
+1 from me for reST (*.rst). I use it quite a lot recently...at home as
well as at work.
Dirk
-Bill
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
