All, On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Chris BeHanna <ch...@behanna.org> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 15:07 , "Managan, Rob" <manag...@llnl.gov> wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Thanks for the info. Sounds like I should have the Install function check >> that the version numbers match. In the use case where Install does not >> know what the version number is then I will believe the one in the library >> name! >> >> Of course, in the example from Eric Raymond on OSX there is only one >> symlink and the version number is located differently. > > Yes, it's very, very different on OS X. OS X uses "Mach-O" format > rather than ELF, and spells ".so" as ".dylib", plus it reverses the order of > the version number and the file type suffix: > > libcurl.so.4 => libcurl.4.dylib > > Mach-O also uses a "compatibility version" that is distinct from the version > that appears in the filename. :-/ Does the implementation work with both linux and OSX? -Bill _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
