On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:19 PM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <ga...@oberbrunner.com> > wrote: > > Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's > > opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git > these > > days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in > what > > you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough > interest, > > or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-) > > My choice is mostly dictated by language. If I used Git, I probably > used CMake or premake. The only advantage of Git I see is GitHub. > Otherwise both are on par. Git has logical feature branches and dumb > repeated add/commit commands. Mercurial screws feature branches > concept, but MQs are awesome. > > So -1, as will require migrating to GitHub and we still haven't done > anything awesome since last migration. =/ Just to correct that misconception, bitbucket hosts git repos too (since 2011). It's quite popular as a git host now. -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
