Russel, I think the alternative is TestSCons.TestSCons().detect_tool(tool). A quick look at the source makes it look like it expects a single tool name to be given. It seems to use an environment created for that tool and uses its path.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- Rob Managan email managan at llnl.gov LLNL phone: 925-423-0903 P.O. Box 808, L-095 FAX: 925-422-3389 Livermore, CA 94551-0808 On 1/21/14 9:39 AM, "Russel Winder" <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: >It is clearly the case that TestSCons.TestSCons().where_is(toolSequence) >uses the users current PATH to search. However when the tool is actually >used, the stripped down PATH is used. This means there appears to be no >way of checking whether a test will fail due to a failure to find the >executable of a tool. > >Or am I missing something? > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
