On 12.12.2014 19:32, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de
<mailto:tshor...@gmx.de>> wrote:
On 12.12.2014 18:43, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
[...]
It would be a little odd to have our code at bitbucket and our
wiki at github, but if github's wiki engine/editor is way
better, I'd consider it. After all our wiki has been a
separate thing for years already.
Ahh, I can already see where you're going with this.... ;)
You're thinking I want to move _everything_ to github I bet.
Actually, no. I do like git better than mercurial, it's true; but
bitbucket seems to have fine git support these days so I'm agnostic on
that.
I was just teasing there... :)
I really just want to get the wiki back up soon, and not have to think
about it anymore for a while :-). If someone proposes some other
code-oriented wiki site I'd be just as happy to use that for the wiki.
I really don't want to be the pessimist in this round, but I'd like to
point out what's on the other side of the equation when we switch to a
VCS-based editing of the Wiki: Someone has to accept (and review?) all
the incoming pull requests. And you can't simply mark persons
"trustworthy for the future", as with the ApprovalQueue. So you have to
accept/merge each time...just sayin'.
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
