SCons supports >=2.7 <3.0 As far as I know, the idea was to not break 2.6 if it was reasonable not to, but no guarantee. Clearly starting work on 2.7 & 3.0 compatible source code would mean 2.6 would be dropped entirely.
I've not read the release notes on 2.7.*, is there some significant difference WRT 3.x compatability in any given version? -Bill Co-Manager, SCons Project On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Tim Jenness <tjenn...@lsst.org> wrote: > > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:16 , Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > > > > There is a flurry of activity on porting Bazaar so it run on Python > > 2.6+ and Python 3. There seems to be a consensus that assuming 3.4 as > > the base Python 3 version is a good idea. > > > > SCons already assumes Python 2.7, but is there a base bugfix version? > > This matters as it determines how much of Python 3 can be assumed. > > > > I have no visibility into how the python3 scons branch is keeping up with > current releases. > > > Are we going to drop the requirement to run on Python 2.6? Currently > > 2.7 is the base but people keep making changes to have things run on > > 2.6. > > > > The last few release notes have been insistently stating that pythons > older than 2.7 will no longer be supported by scons so this is a bit > confusing if scons is still trying to support 2.6. > > — > Tim Jenness > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
