On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Dirk Bächle <tshor...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi all, > > On 04.12.2015 18:10, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> All, >> >> Perhaps it's a good idea to add an official code of conduct for SCons. >> >> http://blog.codinghorror.com/the-hugging-will-continue-until-morale-improves/ >> >> The following site seems to provide a reasonable code. >> http://contributor-covenant.org/ >> >> Thoughts? >> >> > here's my opinion: > > - +1, in general. I don't mind having a CoC, and I fail to see how > following this "mainstream" (allegedly) pattern could harm the project. > - For my personal taste, the yahoo example provided by Gary is too long to > read. Bill's and Russel's texts are shorter, and easier to digest for me as > non-native speaker. > - Simply adopting one of those options would be fine with me. @WBlevins: I > would be opposed to the idea of then adding more regulations on top. It's > not much more than a badge, that says: "We care." And when the time comes, > we'll take actions and "care" without having to look up our CoC. We've done > this successfully in the past... > You are somewhat contradicting yourself here. If we show that we care based on our actions, then why do we need a badge that says we care? Our actions should speak louder than a code of conduct. If we want a code of conduct, then that is fine. I guess my point was... how does that change how we currently do business? Seems that from your comments, it changes nothing. Now we just have some words on a page; not that I am opposed to this. My 2 cents, William > > Best regards, > > Dirk > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev