Seems that we are mostly all either in favor of having one or neutral about having a CoC,so maybe we should just pick a simple one.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 02:08 +0000, William Blevins wrote: > […] > > > > You are somewhat contradicting yourself here. If we show that we care > > based > > on our actions, then why do we need a badge that says we care? Our > > actions > > should speak louder than a code of conduct. > > > > If we want a code of conduct, then that is fine. I guess my point > > was... > > how does that change how we currently do business? Seems that from > > your > > comments, it changes nothing. Now we just have some words on a page; > > not > > that I am opposed to this. > > […] > > I think there is an element of needing to pander to the culture of > political correctness. Some events and communities have had bad > processes and attitudes. Those needed to impose a CoC to try and amend > the behaviour of the not so nice element. However this has now become a > tool for labelling communities good or bad. If you do not have a COC > you are clearly a bad (sexist, racist, <put-your-favourite-ist-here>,…) > community because you do not have a CoC. Thus, there is now a need to > have a CoC to avoid the marketing pressure of the political correctness > police. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
