On Sat, 2015-12-26 at 16:00 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote: > If we change to suggesting pip/easy_install to be the preferred > method of > installing, then we can include any other packages we need and not > have to > "Vendorize" them.
Or for real operating system distributions with package management, just install with the package manager. On these system we do not need to vendorize since when SCons is packaged it can be dependent on future and everything is OK. So the issue is people who install from the SCons release. Is it fair to require them to pip things in? Can we have two releases one pure SCons and one SCons plus future packaged at the moment of creating the package and not vendorized in the SCons repository. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
