Yeah we wouldn't delete the current changes. On Jan 25, 2016 3:22 PM, "Gary Oberbrunner" <ga...@oberbrunner.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> > wrote: > >> The alternative is to abandon the current python3-port and start again >> from default based solely on future. >> > > This doesn't seem crazy to me, although there was a LOT of hand-tweaking > of code on the current python3 branch: utf8/locale stuff, print stmts, > which in a fair number of cases didn't look like any automation would've > caught them. So if you start again I suspect most of that work will have to > be redone. I spent a couple of days on it, iirc, and I wasn't the only one. > Maybe some of those changes could be cherry-picked over? I suggest skimming > some of my changes on that branch (not the merges, just the by-hand stuff) > to get a sense of what had to be done. > > -- > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
