Geir, could you please wait for the branch and then help with comments/suggest alternatives.
thanks, dims On 1/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Deepak Bhole wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now that I have commit access, I plan to commit my previous two patches > > into the repository. Relevant messages are here: > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1606 > > > > and > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1607 > > > > The former is a patch that removes juddi dependency from scout. > > > > The latter, adds ebxml support. > > > > The issue is that the ebxml changes are extensive. They change ALL > > package names in scout (previously, everything was under > > org.apache.ws.scout.* . However, ebxml code is different, which required > > separation into org.apache.ws.uddi.* (everything from org.apache.ws.*) > > and org.apache.ws.ebxml.*. > > Why? > > > > > Commit of the first patch won't break anything (hopefully :)). However, > > once the second one is in, other applications that use scout classes > > directly, will have to be updated to use the newer structure. > > > > I was thinking of tagging the repository after the first patch is > > committed (suggestions for tag name are welcome), after which I would > > upload the second set of changes. If there are any > > objections/suggestions on better ways to handle this, please let me > > know. > > > > Cheers, > > Deepak > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
