Hi Anil,
I still do not understand why not use XMLBeans?
Regards,
Fernando
Anil Saldhana wrote:
Hi Deepak,
Previous :-
What we were missing in Scout were UDDI types that we were previously
relying on juddi. You did the work to remove the dependence and
generate the uddi types during compile time and atleast one place, I saw
that a dependence on xmlbeans library has been introduced into Scout.
Now :-
What I want to do is bring in the uddi types from the juddi project
directly into Scout (org.apache.scout.uddi.v2.datatypes package), so
that we do not rely on either juddi or xmlbeans for the uddi datatypes.
This step I have finished in my local workspace and I have not checked
it in(This is what I mean. :) ).
If there are no objections, I am going to check it in along with the
other bug fixes/tasks.
Regards,
Anil
*/Deepak Bhole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
On Wed, 2006 -03-15 at 13:21 -0800, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Hi All,
> I plan to put the following into Scout v1.0 in the next few days so
> that we can try to have a release in April.
>
> 1) Scout-12: Async Registry Request Implementation [ToDo]
> 2) Remove dependence on both juddi and XMLBeans [Completed but not
> checked in]
> 3) Feature requests/bug fixes from the JIRA.
>
> Any objections to item 2.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by completed but not checked in.
The changes are in the trunk..
re: removing jUDDI and XMLBeans dependence -- there was no inherent
XMLBeans dependence before. However, once jUDDI dependence was removed,
xmlbeans became a dependency since types are now generated on the fly.
Deepak
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=38867/*http://photomail.mail.yahoo.com>
to share photos without annoying attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
