Hi,

I agree with Kurt that we don't need to hold up 1.0 rc1 for the JAXB integration. From geronimo's perspective, I think we are pretty much done with scout inside of geronimo other than the final testing with the rc1 and the final release.

Thanks.

Lin

Kurt T Stam wrote:
Yeah just want to second that it shouldn't break anything, since we'll be supporting both JAXB and XMLBeans. Just don't think this needs to
hold things up now.

Anil Saldhana wrote:
Lin,
Kurt and I have been discussing off line that we can maintain status quo for Scout 1.0rc1 release but will get JAXB integrated (that will still retain the xmlbeans stuff) for the 1.0 final release.

This way we can get some additional time to resolve issues that you may have with Geronimo integration.

In my opinion, having JAXB integration is critical.

Cheers,
Anil

*/Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:

    Hi Kurt,

    That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our
    env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.

    Thanks.

    Lin

    Kurt T Stam wrote:
    > Hi Lin,
    >
    > I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same
    time-frame.
    >
    > We currently have three issues in jira:
    >
    > SCOUT-38 Produce
    > website from the maven2 build
    >
    > Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost
    done anyway
    >
    > SCOUT-14 Binaries from
    > download are empty
    > Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done.
    >
    > SCOUT-12 Implement the
    > Asynchronous Registry Request Feature
    >
    > Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented.
    >
    > So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should
    we vote
    > on doing a 1.0rc1?
    >
    > Input still welcome:).
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > --Kurt
    >
    > p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version
    in the
    > August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2
    binding.
    > I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it
    takes and
    > it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make
    that work.
    > (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding).
    >
    > Lin Sun wrote:
    >> Hi there,
    >>
    >> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working
    towards our
    >> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the
    >> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in
    >> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much
    like
    >> to include scout in our 2.0 release.
    >>
    >> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout
    (1.0?)
    >> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around
    >> the end of July.
    >>
    >> Input welcome :)
    >>
    >> Lin
    >>
    >>
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    >
    >


    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" <http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/;_ylc=X3oDMTE4MGw4Z2hlBF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDZ3JlZW5jZW50ZXI-> at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to