Anil Saldhana wrote:
Tom, good point. I did not think about it.

I will retract my earlier statement over the version number change.

By the way, should Scout hold the new API that supports UDDIv3? Either Scout sticks to JAXR 1.0 spec or does some value added API to support uddiv3?
Your thoughts?

I will open a new discussion thread on the scout-user list. I have no issue going beyond the JAXB implementation, but i think we need to discuss the future of JAXB now that only UDDI survived. We could imply use the UDDIv3 client code; the issue is that JAXR looks like ebXML and not like UDDI.

Regards,
Anil

--- On *Wed, 7/22/09, Tom Cunningham /<[email protected]>/* wrote:


    From: Tom Cunningham <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: Request for Scout v1.1RC1
    To: [email protected]
    Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 12:04 PM

    Shouldn't we keep the scout version numbers in line with the JAXR API
    version they represent, rather than a corresponding UDDI API
    version number?


    Anil Saldhana wrote:
    > Another thought.
    >
    > We should probably rename the v1.1 to Scout v2 to reflect UDDIv2
    > support and then start working on Scout v3 for UDDIv3 needs (to
    > facilitate juddiv3 work that you guys are all doing).
    >
    > --- On *Tue, 7/21/09, Tom Cunningham /<[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>/* wrote:
    >
    >
    >     From: Tom Cunningham <[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     Subject: Re: Request for Scout v1.1RC1
    >     To: [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 10:41 PM
    >
    >     Checked the fix in, and did some additional testing with the 1.1
    >     changes - they look good to me!
    >
    >     Kurt T Stam wrote:
    >     > Well this bug seems to have some urgency since it's holding
    >     people up. It seems that Tom has a fix and he is double checking
    >     things. So when he checks it in (tonight/tomorrow) we can create
    >     some release artifacts and restart the vote for 1.1RC1.
    >     >
    >     > Cheers,
    >     >
    >     > --Kurt
    >     >
    >     > Anil Saldhana wrote:
    >     >> Why not move that fix to RC2?
    >     >>
    >     >> --- On *Tue, 7/21/09, Kurt T Stam /<[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>>/* wrote:
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >>     From: Kurt T Stam <[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>>
    >     >>     Subject: Re: Request for Scout v1.1RC1
    >     >>     To: [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     >>     Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 12:29 AM
    >     >>
    >     >>     Anil Saldhana wrote:
    >     >>     > Hi all,
    >     >>     >   I have removed the xmlbeans dependency and
    brought in JAXB
    >     >>     into Scout in the v1.1 branch
    >     >>     (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-43).  I have
    >     merged
    >     >>     it with the latest changes in trunk.  So basically v1.1
    >     branch is
    >     >>     the latest with all the changes that happened in trunk.
    >     >>     >
    >     >>     > Given this, I would like to propose a release of Scout
    >     v1.1RC1 asap.
    >     >>     >
    >     >>     > +1 from me.
    >     >>     >
    >     >>     > We can hold another vote to make v1.1 the trunk.
    >     >>     >
    >     >>     > Regards,
    >     >>     > Anil
    >     >>     >
    >     >>     >
    >     >>     Hi Anil,
    >     >>
    >     >>     Pretty cool to go to JAXB :). Great work.
    >     >>     However before we can do a release I think we need to at
    >     least fix
    >     >>     SCOUT-72, since this is a blocking the TCK issue.
    >     >>
    >     >>     --Kurt
    >     >>
    >     >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     >>     To unsubscribe, e-mail:
    [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     >>     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>>
    >     >>     For additional commands, e-mail:
    >     [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     >>     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>>
    >     >>
    >     >>
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
    [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     > For additional commands, e-mail:
    [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     >
    >
    >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >     For additional commands, e-mail:
    [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    >     </mc/[email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>>
    >
    >


    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>
    For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
    </mc/[email protected]>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to