By the way there's almost certainly a very nice elegant and cool way to do 
what you want to do without having the entire datastream in memory 
(sketches/streaming 
algorithms 
<https://www.mapr.com/blog/some-important-streaming-algorithms-you-should-know-about>,
 
Chapter 4 here <http://www.mmds.org/>)

On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 11:04:44 AM UTC+1, Salvad0r wrote:
>
> I would like to act on all items, in other word s collect all items and 
> wirte them once to a file adding a header wrapping all the items. A good 
> place for this seem to bee the pipelines, here only item by item is 
> handeled.
>
>  
>
> I fond this solution:  „How to access all scraped items in Scrapy item 
> pipeline?“  
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12768247/how-to-access-all-scraped-items-in-scrapy-item-pipeline
>
>
> But the way seems to be more complex than nessesary.  Is there a smarter, 
> shorter, easier or more elegant way? THX! 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"scrapy-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/scrapy-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to