Hi,
After applying that patch i was able to bootstrap new target and build
libtool.
But later i figured that target not 100% functional. It frequently fails
with "Unsupported syscall: 338 and SegFaults".
I believe the reason for that is that my toolchain is based on
CodeSourcery 2007q1-21 but built with libc2.5.
I wonder if someone has experience with that combination? AFAIK
toolchain based on CodeSourcery 2005q3-2 with libc2.5(from SB1
repository) work fine with qemu-cvs
(http://scratchbox.org/~jhakala/unofficial/scratchbox-devkit-cputransp_1.0.4~200710121350_i386.deb).
Is it GCC 4.2 to blame or qemu-cvs in package mentioned above implements
some additional patches to support glibc2.5?
Ricardo Kekki wrote:
Lauri Leukkunen wrote:
On 11/10/07 12:35 +0200, Eugene San wrote:
Hi all,
I am giving another try to SB2 and collected several questions, on which i
hope to get some questions here:
1) Which toolchains are recommended for use with qemu-0.9.0+20070816-1?
I've tried CodeSourcery 2007q1-21 and qemu fails to run any code
produced by it.
On other hand I've been able to build libtool and kernel with old
CodeSourcery 2005q3-2.
I'm not sure at the moment.
If you want to use CodeSourcery 2007 toolchains then apply the
69_arm_kmb.patch to the qemu-0.9.0+20070816-1. At least for me the
cs2007q3 is working now fine with sb2. The patch can be found from the
sb1 repository:
http://scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=1.0/sb-cputransp-devkit;a=commit;h=20071003122255-f1c71-20c3cd8ff2a734acc5e94b6b28132e7225fdf69b.gz
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
Scratchbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-devel
