thanks timo.
Im new to scratchbox.

> You should use Scratchbox 1.0 and at least sbrsh/sbrshd version 6.7.

I installed Scratchbox 1.0.1 but it have sbrsh 6.6 with it.
Now how can I add sbrsh(>6.7) to scratchbox 1.0.1

> The problem could be that sbrshd is using ld.so from a path that doesn't
exist.  You can try a statically linked sbrshd instead.

Also pls tell me how can I statically link sbrsh

Thanks in advance 
Renjith


-----Original Message-----
From: Timo Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 01 November 2006 12:45
To: RENJITH G WARIER P V
Subject: Re: problem with sbrsh

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:33 +0530, RENJITH G WARIER P V wrote:

Please use the [email protected] mailing list for
support requests.

> Im trying to build GTK+ in OMAP 1710 board. For that I've installed
> scratchbox0.9.8 in the host system and I want to use the actual 
> hardware as the target instead of QEMU.

You should use Scratchbox 1.0 and at least sbrsh/sbrshd version 6.7.

> to get
> Starting sbrshd: /etc/init.d/sbrshd: 126: /usr/sbin/sbrshd: not found
> 
> but sbrshd is there in /usr/sbin
> what could be the problem

The problem could be that sbrshd is using ld.so from a path that doesn't
exist.  You can try a statically linked sbrshd instead.

timo



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
       "This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

       Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this email or any action taken upon this e-mail is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scratchbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users

Reply via email to