Hi Jussi, I've always wonder why glibc is used in most of the toolchain and not uclibc? It seems that I'm missing something. I've used glibc and uclibc toolchains and the size comparison is pretty large, so why is their more emphasis on glibc tools?
On Monday 23 February 2009 08:45:26 am Jussi Hakala wrote: > New releases: > ============= > > * scratchbox-toolchain-cs2007q3-glibc2.5-arm7 1.0.10-6 > * scratchbox-toolchain-cs2007q3-glibc2.5-i486 1.0.10-4 > * scratchbox-toolchain-arm-linux-cs2007q1-21sb1 1.0.10-1 > * scratchbox-toolchain-arm-linux-cs2007q3-51sb3 1.0.10-1 > * scratchbox-toolchain-arm-linux-cs2008q3-72 1.0.10-2 > > Highlights: > =========== > > * Support for sysv fakeroot on non-sbrsh targets > (>= Scratchbox 1.0.13) > > Notes: > ====== > > * Older toolchain packages still work, but they use tcp variant of > fakeroot for all things > * Toolchains with naming scheme arm-linux-* are vanilla Codesourcery > toolchains, and cs2007q3-* have been recompiled with additional > patches and have maemo related things in their default specs > * Apophis R4 wiki page [1] contains the information on known issues > and other release specific things > > Report bugs to scratchbox.org bugzilla. > > Happy hacking, > > Jussi > > [1] http://scratchbox.org/wiki/Apophis-r4 > _______________________________________________ > Scratchbox-users mailing list > Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org > http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Scratchbox-users mailing list Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
