Follow-up Comment #4, bug #53602 (project screen):
I was wrong. It is that commit. Thanks for the git bisect tip. I've not used
that before.
I'm not sure why reversing the patch didn't work the first time...
Anyway, I don't know why those particular characters cause so much trouble.
The table in the commit wasn't generated /that/ long ago.
By the way, I'm on the -dev mailing list. Is it allowed to post replies on
there? Or will they not propagate to this bug tracker?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53602>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
