On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 07:40:50PM -0500, Phil!Gregory wrote: > > - vertical split, complete with resizing > > I'll compile and play with the new code a bit later tonight to see how the > new vertical splits work with 'focus up' and 'focus down', but do you have > plans to add 'focus left' and 'focus right'?
Uh, those two are named wrong. Currently we have "focus next" and "focus prev", and yes, I plan to add up/down/left/right and upmost/downmost/leftmost/rightmost as well. > > - window groups > > I think I can already see uses for this. (I have too many screen > windows. :) > > > - layouts > > Likewise, especially with the vertical splits. > > > You probably have a lot of suggestions and enhancement requests. > > I'd like, at least, to get an official response on whether you'd like to > include my patch to add RFC 1345 digraphs to the 'digraph' command. > > http://aperiodic.net/phil/screen/screen-rfc1345-digraph.patch Good question. There are a couple of issues: 1) it breaks downward compatibility 2) in the old table the order of the two digraph keys does not matter. E.g. it contains a " -> LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS and you can press either a" and "a to get an a-umlaut. This has the following use case: a user can bind bind : digraph \" and then get an a-umlaut by pressing ^A:a, an o-umlaut by pressing ^A:o and so on (so you have created an "umlaut" command). That's also why the old table has: s " -> LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S (German) So it probably makes sense to make this configurable and ship screen with both tables. Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
